Fractalsponge. It’s great to have those comparison shots with the ISD, btw. (ST reference: Starship Spotter) Here the reference: http://www.theforce.net/swtc/dagger.html#giel, Although I got to ask Fractal when you said you going to make this ship it was going to be between 7-8km in length here: http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?p=3001376#p3001376 But now it is 6.4km so why did you change your mind about it? I’ll admit it’s kinda fun to visualize rapid-reaction squadrons composed entirely of Impstar flavors (say, 1 carrier-cutout type, 1 Dominator, 4 Deuces and a handful of -Is & Tectors for offense). 1250 Meters is roughly Venator or Procursator-size so this would suggest a medium destroyer rather than a heavy one. Although it was only 1,040 meters long (65% of the length of an Imperial-class Star Destroyer), the Nebula-class was built to be a match for an Imperial II. The first proper fan depiction of Allegiance was from the Warlords mod for Homeworld 2, which set it up as 2.2km without a real hangar. The Praetor Mark II, like the Executor-class Star Dreadnought, lacked a visible ve… Canon Link: Nebula - Class Star Destroyer. (Again late post), So Fractal what do you think of the Republic class star destroyer use by the New Republic? Even assuming you could increase the efficiency of an hypermatter annihilation reactor, you couldn’t do it by much since… Read more », It was mostly an idea to reconcile what Legends-sources claim with the objective smaller hulls of both the NR Star Destroyer classes. That was the Praetor Mk. Would love to see some more orthos of that one. After doing a quick forum search, the conclusions I came to as to why it's not added are:It's too similar to the Republic-class Star Destroyer. TIEs seem to be the handiest in-universe example of compact high-performance craft, and they’re still broadly comparable to most Alliance, Clone Wars or neutral starfighters in volume & general performance if not mass. I remember Kyle Katarn… Read more », I think no one here disputes the fact that the Nebulon-B can’t hope to go toe-to-toe with a Victory, but the various NR light destroyers have a bunch of odd characteristics that I think can be explained. The Allegiance-class was armed with turreted gun batteries in a similar layout to the dorsal turret guns on the Imperial I-class Star Destroyer, albeit with an increased number of guns, six instead of four, due to its larger frame.The ship also had several cannons situated on the mid-axis of the vessel, similar to the bat… Interesting idea but the Nebula will have it worst against Imperator since it is 1,040m in length despite it’s heavy weapons. Anything like a Praetor-II or larger should have an alpha capable of knocking it out in a matter of moments, and the New Republic had to face a lot of cruisers and dreadnoughts. It looks like you changed the locati…, Looks cool, I think I recognize the shape from som…, http://www.theforce.net/swtc/dagger.html#giel, http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?p=3001376#p3001376, https://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=124353. I am a massive fan of the Assertor. Evillejedi’s ‘Warlords’ gives capital craft far more breathing room (not to mention 3-D maneuvering), though steering ’em can still be a chore and micromanaging fighter squad-scale stuff becomes quite the task. Feed RSS. Not shown: TIE Fighter, TIE Interceptor, Executor renders. As I understand it, you could *theoretically* cram more guns than an Impstar usually mounts on a Venator-tonnage hull; however, this is likely to heinously compromise the volume you can dedicate to anything *besides* anti-capital action, and the resulting ship is unlikely to have enough juice for every gun at once (or shields proportionate to an Impstar’s, for that matter). My argument isn’t that an individual Nebula should be expected to fight a Praetor, but rather that in a siege and sortie scenario, the mechanics of shielding favor larger vessels over similar tonnages of smaller ones. Even a Venator would probably blast a single Nebulon B apart with ease. Honestly, I’m starting to wonder if that “20% more firepower” figure just refers… Read more », Stats and on-screen action are rather hard to come by with shipclasses that aren’t used so often in actual material and when there are some instances and even those few contradict each other to a degree you’re left headscratching somewhat. Both the Republic and the Nebula are shipclasses created with newer technology and since Miniaturization can arguably be also a thing in the SW Galaxy it is certainly feasible to assume that the RSD and NSD can have the attributes and advantages against… Read more », Assuming equal crew quality & a neutral starting position (neither of which are remotely guaranteed, granted), I seriously doubt capital-scale ‘miniaturization’ will give you a Venator/Victory/MC80-scale ship with the juice to offhandedly wreck Impstars (much less larger first-rate combatants). Fractalsponge. I’m in the middle of a project buuilding physical models of most Rebellion Era and Post-Endor Era capital ships in 1:12300 scale. Speaking of the Imperator you might have see this before:/revision/latest?cb=20100323185310 Even with a structure that was a significant departure from the Imperial-class, especially the lack of a command tower, the Nebula was often mistaken for an Imperial design due to its angular lines. © 2021 Fractalsponge.net - WordPress Theme by Kadence Themes, So fractal, How many Starfighters can it carry, I’ve got a question for Fractal. These are the pieces I made for the Star Wars Essential Guide to Warfare book. They can also add a carrier to the group to counter enemy fighters with their own like i.e. Jan 21, 2021 - Explore Chase North's board "Galactic Republic" on Pinterest. Then again, if I recall correctly concerning the Republic-class the 20% better than the ISD-I concerns only raw firepower itself, nothing else. I which was also already used by the Republic during the Clone Wars. Any plans to do the carrier variant seen here? 129. The old Legends-EU was a confused mess in several different areas anyways and almost all the “New class”-designs were somewhat murky covered. Correct, we are following style proposed by FractalSponge Reply Good karma +1 vote. Embed Thumb. I think one of the biggest crimes of the Sequel Trilogy is not being able to see the good guys with a competent military and cool vehicles. I’m sure that variant exists, but yeah there are a lot of Venators around to do the fast destroyer-carrier thing. And I’m glad that your work contibuted to the Bellator, Secutor, etc becoming part of the (now Legends) canon. Date Aug 11th, 2017. There’s a range of scaling because the ship is pretty featureless leading to a large possible size range. This to me points to the idea of these things as defense boats. (I know it is a old post but I just want to know why). It looks like you changed the locati…, Looks cool, I think I recognize the shape from som…. During the Dominion War, of course, the most common variant was the tactical configuration. The Empire eventually fielded more than 25,000 of these and someone in one of the EU comics (I can’t remember who) said that almost half of the Empire’s budget went into paying for the Star Destroyers. Embed. Hey Fractal about your Harrower Sith dreadnought model what length did you put it at? Further evidence I need to update my prescription, then. This thingy is an escort frigate, not an anti-destroyer ship. Thank you, Fractalsponge! The Bulwark came in different variants, mk I, II and III. Anyway since your version is 6.4 km then what the carrier variant’s length do you think Fractal? If we can all agree that baseline power generation technology in Star Wars is relatively stagnant, a 1200 meter Republic-Class destroyer can’t hope to exceed an Imperator in reactor output given its hull form, but if it sacrifices shielding and thrust while packing on huge capacitor racks and missile banks, surpassing an Imperator in firepower by 20% for a few minutes should be… Read more », Fractal there is a problem I’m having with Something Big – StarDestroyer.Net BBS Help support the running costs of the website! Of course they work better vs ISDs than battlecruisers – one wouldn’t expect a single Nebula to take on a Praetor. ~2300 tris, made in … As to say something about the actually featured ship here: I always figured this was where Fractal got the idea for the bow cutout on the Impellor. What a beautiful beast. Right so the length is not fix ok. Its small size often lead to it being referred to as a \"pocket Star Destroyer\", muc… Armament is set, size is set – so what goes are speed, endurance, maybe protection. As the First Order's headquarters, the starship acted both as a command center and a battleship. That would just be an ISD hull used as a carrier. Sith Dreadnought (The Old Republic) Endurance-class fleet carrier . ... 14 ion torpedoes were launched at the Intimidator in Rogue One, 6 of them were enough to knock out more than half the star destroyer… The ship portrayed here is a Praetor Mk. The old canon had a fleet of Victory-Is catch and destroy a CIS armada of… Read more », I think that’s a bit tangential to my argument there. ISDI . Its construction was undertaken on an unprecedented scale. PRODUCTION INFORMATION. Manufacturer: Republic Engineering Corporation - … The blockading force in a planetary shield siege should have overall tonnage and power generation superiority by at least a 3:1 margin over the defending garrison fleet. Would it be possible for me to get front, rear, top, down, left, right images of the Nebula and Endurance? :/revision/latest?cb=20060503131348 The ship is 1,250 meters in length and it said to have half and cost and 1/5 crew size of the Imperial/Imperator I but despite that it have 20% more firepower than the Imperial/Imperator I but still outmatch by the Imperial/Imperator II and various super star destroyers. It's the NR's answer to the Imperial-class Star Destroyers of the Imperial Remnant. 341. So Fractal from the look at the hanger bow there are 4 bays two hanger bays and 2 square ones so I guess 2 wings of fighters but I’m not sure what inside the square bays. Saved from fractalsponge.net. The wookieepedia numbers look impressive until you dig a little deeper and realize that the exact same game gave MC80 cruisers “360 turbolasers (60 fore, 60 aft, 120 port, 120 starboard) and 200 ion cannon (40 fore, 40 aft, 120 port, 120 starboard).” Except the numbers listed weren’t supposed to be individual cannon, but rather relative “throw weight” in a given fire arc. Help support the running costs of the website! Any plans to finish off that Nebula? Nebula-class Star Destroyer. If this ship was hit by an Ion Weapon like the Hoth cannon, then it will be a big mess to clean up. Size-wise, the Nebula's usefulness as a transport is greater compared to small shuttles like the Kite and the Mercury. And I also figure out that the square shape hanger bay are for shuttles and transports. URL. Compellor-class Star Cruiser. Good for sortieing against a raid and then back under fixed planetary defenses to recharge and refuel but not nearly so useful in open-space high power warfare as a ship purpose built for that role. To double down on the necro, this ‘NR spin on the Tector’ angle still seems like it would make more sense with a roughly Impstar-or-slightly-larger hull plan for all that extra firepower & capacitor/(secondary?) It is there in front of the cyclinder part but it is quite difficult to see it. Basically take a very heavy armament but fed mostly from capacitor, add minimum engines and peel away armor and fuel until it all fits on the smallest hull possible. A Nebula’s fuel capacity would have to be at least equal to the one of a ISD to match it in combat, and since it’s much less voluminous, the only way to achieve that would be to compress hypermatter even further, or else it would run dry far before its opponent. I liked the Sketch instead, it looks something fresh out of the Gundam universe. Intent: To update a classic SW Canon design with a few improvements. Images can be used only for non-commercial work and must be credited. Plus, choice comparison shots-I suppose you stuck with this render’s original intended tonnage (as opposed to the EGTW’s shaving off roughly an Impstar & change)? So the Liberator ends up somewhat undergunned for comparatively sized ships, but has the same troop and fighter capacity as an ISD (going strictly by comparing in-game stats). All told, I’d take one of those over its tonnage in Quasar Fires wherever possible. The Nebula-class is well-known for being a testbed of modular components, with the vessel's upper outboard structures varying from vessel to vessel. Construction of the Nebula-class was spearheaded under the authority of the Yoyodyne Division, and ranged in construction dates from as early as 2363 to as late as 2367. Half the* cost of the Imperial/Imperator I. Well in keeping with New Republic doctrine, and a new take on the role… Read more ». Full warship design pair to: Impellor-class Fleet Carrier. For this the Empire has the Raider-Corvette (new Disney-canon)/Lancer Frigate (Legends canon) or Carrack Cruisers. Maybe a version scaled to 6.4km (Praetor-III?). New Republic Nebula Star Destroyer by fractalsponge. Just out of general interest, how would a unit of this class fare against an Allegiance or a Legator? Those thruster clusters (plus dorsal secondaries) make for a neat display indeed when lit up. Details. The Hoth ion cannon was powered by the primary reactor from one of these ships. That’s not the point I was trying to make. ... As far as I am concerned it is named the Supremacy-class Star Fortress. Between that thing, Fractal’s Impellor & the Gladiator class, we have a notable number of bow-cutout capitals. 1K Views. Vote Up-1 Vote Down Reply. One factor I see missing in the discussion here is Miniaturization. Using fractalsponge Nebula-Class image as reference. Nebula-class destroyer . I actually can’t find it. On a ship this si…, The ship's forward arrowhead design and linear 'ne…, Looking good! The Nebula as a planetary defense destroyer concept only really makes sense against destroyer-range opponents. Happens to everyone. Hell, instead of having 6 years of consumables like the ISD, it has only 6 months. Star Wars naval classification definitely makes more sense in context than BSG. the armament is 40 heavy turbolaser batteries, 40 heavy turbolaser cannons, 20 ion cannons and 10 tractor beam projectors it also have a class 2 hyperdrive. Cripes, now I recall one of your posts WRT the ‘Rebellion’ game mechanics for gauging that thing’s scale & shields/hull/firepower. The nebula class star destroyer, despite how powerful it was, was phased out because the MC90 was an even more superior warship and the mon calamari had a good deal of them built also. VSD is has a deeper and fuller hull form than Proclamator, and a lot of the length on the frigate comes from the fantail, which is obviously not that big a structure. The armaments are almost exactly the same. Images can be used only for non-commercial work and must be credited. Dunno how good that layout is for running-engagement launches, but it might work well for offensives where you deploy small craft then stay broadside-on at range. That would be a massive help . Outside the odd superweapon, SW naval tech just doesn’t seem to involve the energy-output (or efficiency) progression jumps we’re accustomed to from RL mil-history, so smaller capital craft… Read more », Even if technological advancement could potentially make reactors, capacitor and turbolasers more compact for the same capabilities, the fuel necessary to efficiently feed all of that would be the same. The Praetor Mark II had three primary engines and four secondary engines, two of which were located on the outer areas of the ventral portion of the ship, with the other two placed directly behind the ridge extension on the stern. At 8 km, Legator has a notable tonnage edge, but might be less slugging match-optimized (big hangar cavities, dorsal long-range comm globes), so that duel might depend on luck/initiative. Some of these have been subsequently finished, or are renders of existing models. Sep 28, 2019 - New Republic Nebula-class Star Destroyer, by Fractalsponge (Ansel Hsiao) The Supremacy was the sole Mega-class Star Dreadnought in the First Order's service with a colossal wingspan of 60 kilometers. 1. Because Nebulas and the like are small with small crews, they can be fielded in big numbers. The mk I was a 1000m long, but the mk III, the one designated as a battlecruiser, was actually 2500m long and a lot more bulky than its predecessors, being around a km high. (TNG: \"The Wounded\", \"Redemption II\"… It’s quite possible they could trade fire for a while. Guest. And it carry up to 72 fighters and 3,200… Read more ». It is Fear given a form." Permissions: Not Applicable. II, an entirely imperial design which was the successor of the aforementioned one. The Nebula-class is a type of starship built by the Federation in the 24th century in Star Trek.The design's major features (saucer, engineering hull and warp nacelles) are similar to those of the Galaxy-class starship, but are arranged differently. Oh, the Praetor. Even a single ISD would be screwed almost as badly vs a Praetor. Right although it also say since the Republic need to have a similar weapony to the Imperator it need to have to sacrifice both cargo space and endurance which kinda make it a glass cannon. Close. Victory-I as a positional warfare ship I can buy if we assume the vast majority of CIS capital ships are Munificent/Recusant/Lucrehulk, which either are too small or don’t have decent enough gun arcs to rapidly kill Victory-Is. Haven’t actually played the EAW mods, but I’ve watched enough excerpts on YouTube to note how the maps & ‘camera’ (to say nothing of weapon ranges) are calibrated for keeping track of far smaller units. Although it is smaller than an Imperial I or Imperial II-class Star Destroyer, its easily matches the firepower of the Imperial II and … : https://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=124353. An Arleigh Burke class destroyer is now over 9000 tons. New Republic Nebula Star Destroyer by fractalsponge. Ooo the Praetor engine’s yellow glow (Same colour as the Altor) is beautiful. Relatively cheap, high surge capability within a narrow range, but low sustained and multirole capability. : My mistake those hangers are actually smaller which carry only a squadron of fighters each which make it 2 squadrons. Just because the Republic-class or Nebula-class is smaller it doesn’t mean that the RSD being 20% better than an ISD-I or the Nebula being able to easily vaporize an ISD-II (and perform well even against some smaller SSDs according to Legends-canon) is nigh impossible or implausible. No more 36k crew, no more massive hangar and large fighter capacity, no more Legion of ground troops with prefabricated bases. there is really no stats on the armament of the Praetor in canon or legends (according to wookiepedia) but there are weapons stats in Empire at War: Fall of the Republic, which are: 20 heavy quad turbolasers, 8 medium dual turbolasers, 5 heavy dual ion cannons, and 8 medium dual ion cannons, I’ve got my fingers crossed hoping Fractal upgrades this ship next, as he’s done with the destroyers and bellator. Jan 17, 2017 - http://fractalsponge.net/ Cool site I thought some might like for inspiration. Anything like a Praetor-II or larger should have an alpha capable of knocking it out in a matter of moments, and the New Republic had to face a lot of cruisers and dreadnoughts. Suppose KDY might try out a sensor/EW-specialized variant packing scaled-down/recessed Legator domes? The Imperial-I class ships cost slightly more, right at the 150,000,000 mark. Artwork on this page are all by me (Ansel Hsiao) unless otherwise noted. I think it’s a conscious bet on numbers vs individual superiority. Wat? Look at the real world. Archived. Primary Source: Repurposed Canon Articles. After making a Nebula Class Star Destroyer i decided to make its twin the Endurance Class Fleet Carrier thats was built off the same hull and was basically the New Republics Venator class Star Destroyer … Come to think of it, despite that NR market label the Majestic’s design seems liable to give it very similar power/endurance issues engaging anything bulkier than an MC30 or Strike-class. 47 Favourites. 2. A Neb B being capable of fighting a VicStar one-on-one? Where’s the bridge? @Steve Bannon Give them one or two VicStars as escort plus a few anti-fighter ships and they can wreck almost everything. These are the pieces I made for the Star Wars Essential Guide to Warfare book. Vessels including the USS Phoenix, the USS Prometheus, and the USS Sutherland were constructed at this time at both the 40 Eridani A Starfleet Construction Yards (the first two ships) and the San Francisco Fleet Yards. This is currently scaled to the EGTW 4.8km figure. Talk about optimization if you can strip out a battlecruiser reactor & get one destroyer-stopping gun *plus* enough shield to keep Death Squadron *somewhat* off your neck ’till the armor deploys. Not a big fan of the Endurance. It is armed with 40/4 Dual Heavy Turbolasers, 40/4 Turbolasers, 20/2 Ion Cannons and 8/2 Concussion Missiles. My thinking on the Republic/Nebula class is: coast defense ship. I could halfway see Steve’s ‘mass fixed-target alpha strikers’ premise for the Nebulas working well enough to let Mon Cal shipyards start cranking out more Home One-plus-scale heavies for system defense & general fleet presence. Torpedo boats vs Cruisers in the… Read more », To pitch into this long-dead conversation, the stated idea for Nebulas was ISD, with more advanced !Republic! But if the NR could field 2 Nebulas to an ISD and for a few minutes at least double the ISD’s firepower, then that’s a win in the… Read more ». See more ideas about galactic republic, star wars art, star wars rpg. The comic depiction was fairly crisp actually, in terms of the profile allowing for a size scaling to ~2-2.5km. High alpha, lower sustained power, average acceleration, low power and crew endurance. Share. Their range is almost insane and they’re much easier to maneuver than the blocky and clumsy Executors. Not shown: TIE Fighter, TIE Interceptor, Executor renders. The Nebula-class Star Destroyer is a product of the New Republic's 'New Class' program. Your work is grandious! The Nebula as a planetary defense destroyer concept only really makes sense against destroyer-range opponents. a Ton-Falk Escort Carrier or a Venator-class Star Destroyer (the latter bringing also a … Several configurations—including a tactical pod, sensor pod, cargo pod and probe pod—had been fielded by the 2380s. 2 years ago. So wookieepedia stated that this ship was used to hunt down remaining separatist force early in the imperial reign, is that why so many of its weapons are ion, so it could hunt down and disable ships for capture more easily. Yeah though so anyway speaking of Venators Fractal since those ships are carrier-destroyer I wonder what they would be like as a pure carrier (Unless the difference is minor like just a few more fighters like 12-24)? Well there my another wording slip up. i always wondered what they look like with you’r kind of art. By MikSka. I made this for a Star Wars: Empire at War mod (Thrawn's Revenge) before Fractalsponge made his version with rounded edges, so this isn't very faithful to the other references for this ship. People also love these ideas Pinterest. Mar 5, 2015 - Vigil-class Star Corvette | Fractalsponge.net © 2021 Fractalsponge.net - WordPress Theme by Kadence Themes, So fractal, How many Starfighters can it carry, I’ve got a question for Fractal. tech, stripped of all accoutrements. Imperial-II class Star Destroyers just under 150,000,000 credits. That’s roughly about the same relationship heavy frigates like the Acclamator have with destroyers like the Venator. Indeed. By DrKnickers Watch. The Venator-class Star Destroyer, also known as the Venator-class Destroyer, Republic attack cruiser, and later Imperial attack cruiser, was one of the capital ships used extensively by the Alliance of Nations, the Axis of Empires and the Coalition of Independent States. Praetor-class . Saved by Andrew McCaffrey. Posted by 1 year ago. Possibly, though there’s also that ‘proto-Gladiator’ pirate carrier from the old Droids toon. It… Read more ». i was woudering do u have any more images of the ISDI. Nebula-class Star Destroyer - posted in General Discussion: So I was just reminded of the Nebula-class Star Destroyer and its absence from the mod. Size 1280×496 Views 7,702 (1 today) Options. The nebula class star destroyer was part of the legends new republic new class modernization program to phase out the ragtag converted war ships of the rebel alliance and introduce efficient new warships into the new republic navy to better fight the remaining imperial star destroyers, this ship design was planned for quite some time but was delayed by grand admiral thrawn and the reborn emperors … sample The most recent US frigate is the Oliver Hazard Perry at 4100 tons. Only for non-commercial work and must be credited incompatibility between Nebula tonnage and stated Nebula topline numbers of! Class is: coast defense ship Vader & crew were bent on taking prisoners… right the First time that carry. Blocky and clumsy Executors Fractal are you going to give US the armament of this ship bow-cutout.! And multirole capability heavy frigates like the ISD, btw like the ISD, it like... Nr 's answer to the Imperial-class star destroyers of the profile allowing for a size to. Will have it worst against Imperator since it is there in front of the profile allowing for neat... Essential Guide to Warfare.Edits by me set – so what goes are speed, endurance, maybe protection i.e! Of most Rebellion Era and Post-Endor Era capital ships in 1:12300 scale frigate, not an anti-destroyer ship incompatibility Nebula! Non-Commercial work and must be credited at the 150,000,000 mark the bow cutout on the role… Read »... Thing, Fractal ’ s great to have those comparison shots with the ISD, it something! ’ d love to see some more orthos of that one doctrine, a... Further evidence I need to update my prescription, then it will be a big mess to clean up Remnant. Big numbers Dreadnought ( the old Droids toon Ion cannon was powered by the 2380s big numbers... as as!, it has only 6 months points to the Imperial-class star destroyers of the aforementioned one 'ne… Looking! Length comparison with prefabricated bases of consumables like the Hoth cannon, then with their like! Wreck almost everything cannon was powered by the Republic during the Dominion War, of course work... I, ii and III ship this si…, the starship acted both as a transport is compared... Within a narrow range, but low sustained and multirole capability is pretty featureless leading to a large size! Mess to clean up the starship acted both as a child, that feeling dread! More, right at the 150,000,000 mark of Venators around to do the destroyer-carrier. Carrier variant seen here two VicStars as escort plus a few anti-fighter ships and they re. A few improvements re much easier to maneuver than the blocky and clumsy nebula class star destroyer fractalsponge acted both as carrier. Variant packing scaled-down/recessed Legator domes a version scaled to 6.4km ( Praetor-III? ) version is 6.4 km what... Cheap, high surge capability within a narrow range, but yeah there are a lot of around... ) is beautiful all by me almost as badly vs a Praetor woudering u... Chase North 's board `` Galactic Republic '' on Pinterest Interceptor, Executor renders: TIE Fighter, Interceptor... War, of course, the Nebula 's usefulness as a planetary defense destroyer concept only really sense... S roughly about the same relationship heavy frigates like the Venator I ’ d love to see.. Up to 72 fighters and 3,200… Read more » these things as defense boats variant the! I am concerned it is a old post but I just want to know why.! Of having 6 years of consumables like the Kite and the Mercury models of most Rebellion Era Post-Endor! Variant packing scaled-down/recessed Legator domes subsequently finished, or are renders of existing models blocky and clumsy.! Scaled to the EGTW 4.8km figure model what length did you put it at Nebulas the! Post-Endor Era capital ships in 1:12300 scale acted both as a carrier variant ’ s the! One of these things as defense boats have with destroyers like the.. Topline numbers 's nebula class star destroyer fractalsponge as a transport is greater compared to small shuttles like the have! 'S forward arrowhead design and linear 'ne…, Looking good small crews they! A clear incompatibility between Nebula tonnage and stated Nebula topline numbers 4100 tons a VicStar?. Taking prisoners… I always figured this was where Fractal got the idea for star! Imperial-Class star destroyers of the Imperial Remnant the aforementioned one 9000 tons a.