No one should be restricted from rights and opportunities that others are given for that long. An Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam Martin Luther King Jr. builds an argument to persuade his audience that American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. Overall, the effective use of various rhetorical strategies is what makes the speech so valuable. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. You may use it as a guide or sample for First of all, King makes his point clear by appealing to the reader's common sense, beliefs and values (logos). In Dr. Martin Luther Kings speech Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. By continuing well assume you board with our, Rhetorical Analysis on Kennedy Steel Speech, Rhetorical Analysis of The Mexican-American and the Chruch Speech, Analysis of Dr. Martin Luther Kings I Have a Dream Speech, Rhetorical Devices in Bill Clintons Speech at the Democratic Convention, Speech Analysis: Speech in the Virginia Convention, How to secure financing as a small business owner, How to Make a Business Plan for Any Business, 7 Crucial Macro Environment Factors to Include in Your Analysis, Macro Environment Examples in the Real World. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. In conclusion, Martin Luther King, Jr uses ethos, pathos, and logos, among other rhetorical devices, to support his argument that American policy in Vietnam was inconsistent with its treatment of African-Americans in the United States. Society's punishments are small wounds compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Many of us have felt the anxiety to speak up against what we know is wrong. His speech grows deeply sarcastic at times. In front of over 3000 people at the New York Riverside Church King preaches to a room filled with clergy and laymen concerned about the Vietnam. These arguments work because they point out that even though the war is not happening on our soil, it is having a devastating effect here, especially in poor areas where people cannot afford to be hindered any more than they already are. King supports his discussion by establishing authority and appealing to his listeners emotions. Martin Luther King Jr., Malcom X, and Stokely Carmichael all had quite famous speeches that took a stance on racial inequality. The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the. This special lyrical and parallel structure helped get his main points across and allows a large audience to understand simple but powerful words (Layfield) . War was an inhuman and barbaric exercise and America's participation was not in human interest. Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence SHEC: Resources for Teachers Moreover, it is the poor and the helpless mainly who are falling prey to this war game. King said, the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at homeWe were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond | Bartleby Furthermore, such a vivid picture will linger permanently in the audiences mind, which will make them think about the terrible outcome in the future. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. King calms the African Americans who are being oppressed by using the words, this situation can and will be changed. and Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. which gives them hope that there will be a new day when a change will take place. All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. By expressing how much he believes in the American dream and a new dawn, it reassures people that even though there is little progress at a time, King will always fight not only for himself, but his family, friends, and all those who are not held to the same respect. King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. For example, King says, We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights (2). Instead, King chooses to use facts to show what an illness war is. Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam Analysis - 341 Words | Bartleby The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam - 419 Words | Cram King, Martin Luther Jr. Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence. Church Meeting, 1967, Riverside Church, New York City. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence In the speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence," by Martin Luther King Jr. he expresses his opinion on how the Vietnam war is unjust. He spoke at Riverside Church in New York City, a venue that had a history of hosting progressive speakers and thinkers. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam - 751 Words | Cram Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. In his second paragraph, he connects with his audience by saying we have been repeatedly faced, For instance, in the second paragraph of his speech, he says, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor. The words silent, cruel, and manipulation speak out to an audience, especially for one that has faced hardship themselves in times of need. The speech deemed racial segregation to be an inhumane practice that subdivides society into groups that essentially alienate them from the true sense of humanity; which is brotherhood. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam", Key Ingredients to Being a Successful Student. submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism. He quotes Langston Hughes, in his speech to establish a connection between the struggle for civil liberty in United States and the oppression in Vietnam. He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue. He also states, I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. In this way, he personifies war as a demon that consumes people's lives and a nation's valuable resources which would otherwise be happy if it was not being ruined by bombs and bullets. (2022) 'The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis'. Correct writing styles (it is advised to use correct citations) The fact that young black men are being sent [across the world] to fight for the liberties in Southeast Asia, which they [have] not found in Georgia and East Harlem questions the validity of Americas founding principles of the unalienable rights of every individual; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam He strengthens his argument through his use of rhetorical questions and an anecdote. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam - 648 Words | 123 Help Me https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. Through the emotional, destruction of America's effort to support the war, King's powerful use of diction talking the loss of desire and new lives causes the audience to feel sorry for the poor of America. In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. The speech was given to a large, mixed audience of primarily civil rights activists. There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" December 22, 2016 By Richcoca PLATINUM, Canoga Park, California More by this author Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement,. Analyzes the literary device martin luther king jr. uses in his speech is allusions, adding to the importance on how awful the vietnam war was corrupting the united states. assume youre on board with our, Martin Luther King Jr. vs. President Obama, https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/. Through utilising figurative language to juxtapose optimistic progress and demonic destruction, King is able to emphasise how devastating the Vietnam War is. The Speech "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence" by Martin Luther Vietnam War Rhetorical Analysis - 896 Words | Bartleby Dr. Kings purpose is to make the church leaders he is speaking to aware that the time has come for them to speak out loudly in opposition of the war in Vietnam. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? Through this speech, and his ideals of determination, many rhetorical devices are put to use to drive forth these points. In a similar light, King addressed the speech I have a dream to a peaceful mass gathering in Washington asking for change. This lecture became an explosive example of colorful language and visual examples that expanded the idea of rhetoric. Read More Use Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Speech 409 Words | 2 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. was extremely passionate about nonviolence. He also says the war is further crippling the poor in the United States by sending a disproportional number of them to the front lines to die. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence analytical essay Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", he used a variety of techniques to reinforce the argument and persuasiveness of the American involvement in the Vietnam War. He applies ethos to establish credibility, pathos to appeal to emotions, and logos to support his claims with hard evidence. Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes Americas involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. What Is the Macro Environment in Business Analysis? Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his views on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. In a solemn tone, he talks about their crops being destroyed and their water being poisoned, presumably referring to Agent Orange. It allows them to imagine what might happen if America were to keep fighting in the war. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. He spoke at Riverside Church in New York City, a venue that had a history of hosting progressive speakers and thinkers. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. He is using vivid language to describe the casualties; however, they are also supported by evidence, as he is using precise numbers in this part of the speech. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Favorite Quote:"Faith is taking another step without seeing the entire staircase.". Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. To start, Dr. Kings use of metaphors allows his audience to understand his viewpoint better. How Does Martin Luther King Use Rhetorical Devices In the speech, Martin Luther King specifically indicates that America needs to end the war with Vietnam. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". He means to make people ask questions of themselves and ponder over the meaninglessness and uselessness of war and what would remain behind once the war was over. Lastly, Martin Luther King uses logos in his famous speech. Apart from being an advocate of Mahatma Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, Martin Luther King Jr was a great leader and rhetor of all times. https://nolongerinvisiblemen.wordpress.com/2014/11/11/sparknotes-for-martin-luther-king-jr-s-a-time-to-break-silence/, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm, Microsoft Corporation SWOT Analysis (2016), Zora Neale Hurstons Their Eyes were watching God: Analysis. Despite having a shining moment of experiments, hopes, [and] new beginnings during the struggle for human rights, King illustrates the Vietnam War as broken and eviscerate and a political plaything of a society gone mad on war. These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. (King). match. It is why he constructs an argument that will help people decide which side to stand with and which to not. It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. This paper examines the conditions of the Afro-Americans lives from 1960-today with focus on education, work, income, police brutality and criminality. Through his compelling arguments and moral vision, King inspired many people to join the movement against the Vietnam War and to work for a more just and peaceful world. In multiple paragraphs of his speech, King effectively appeals to emotion by using personal anecdotes that involve him speaking to people of poverty directly. They all had the same goal, but took a different approach with their speeches, and how they would rally support to improve racial equality. He uses the word 'We', connecting with the audience and ensuring them that together they will bring change to social conditions and attitudes. It also uses a bit of strong imagery. He specifically mentions a poverty program that was looking promising before the United States became involved in Vietnam. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis."